General findings

According to the 2020 General Social Survey on Social Identity, one in five Black and Indigenous people have little or no confidence in the police, double the proportion among those who were neither Indigenous nor a visible minority.Footnote 4 Based on the engagement sessions conducted, a lack of confidence exists not only when interacting with the police but also when interacting with the courts, corrections officers and other agents of the justice system. Here is what we heard when participants were asked to describe their experiences or those of their family members when interacting with the justice system:

When asked, “How have your experiences shaped your opinion of the justice system?” numerous participants described an erosion of trust towards the justice system.

Participants highlighted the lack of intercultural competence among justice system actors as a primary barrier to Black Canadians' access to justice. They also noted the disregard for socio-economic disparities and social determinants of justice when interacting with the system. Black youth and adults emphasized the importance of anti-racism training, intercultural communication, and other educational initiatives for police, judges, and probation officers to address biases within the justice system.

Additionally, some participants mentioned that preconceived notions about Black youth as threats hindered career opportunities in law enforcement, especially for Black and Muslim individuals.

Summary of emotional feelings experienced by Black Canadians when interacting with the justice system.
Summary of emotional feelings experienced by Black Canadians when interacting with the justice system
Figure 4 - Text version
  • overwhelmed
  • gloomy
  • heartbroken
  • sadness
  • emotional
  • anxiety
  • shocked
  • worried
  • surprised
  • afraid
  • scared
  • nervous
  • despondent
  • anxious
  • disheartened
  • exasperated
  • guilt
  • regret
  • vulnerable
  • frustrated
  • vulnerability
  • concern
  • fear
  • relief
  • upset
  • engrossed
  • empathy
  • absorbed
  • angry
  • sad
  • pensive

Validating the five pillars of the CBJS Framework

Despite the abundance of recommendations, a comprehensive understanding of how Black Canadians experience the justice system is absent due in part to a lack of disaggregated data and the underrepresentation of Black individuals as lawyers, judges and legal policymakers.

Jaku Konbit sought to capture directly from Black individuals their perspectives on existing recommendations under the five pillars to address the overrepresentation of Black people in the criminal justice system, including as victims of crime, and other solutions to improve the experiences of Black Canadians with the justice system. When asked if they supported the recommendations in the Framework, the vast majority responded positively. However, they questioned the government’s commitment to change, as many of the recommendations, as well as the issue itself, are decades old.

Others stressed that a systems approach is needed: improving policing does not happen without also addressing social determinants of justice.

For all five pillars, participants were asked to vote on how effective they perceived the Framework’s recommendations might be for addressing anti-Black racism in the justice system. Participants were then asked to provide recommendations for consideration. Those recommendations are summarized below.

Social determinants of justice

91.2% of respondents believe the Framework’s recommendations will help reduce the involvement of Black people in the justice system.

Policing

85.3% of respondents think the Framework's recommendations will help to reduce negative interactions between Black people and police.

Courts and legislation

85.3% of respondents think the Framework's recommendations will help to reduce the over-incarceration of Black people.

“My white lawyer wanted me to say I was guilty of a crime I didn’t commit. My case kept getting put off for no reason. No one in authority looks like us, and my lawyer seems to be working against my best interest. All, if not most, of the jurors are always white. So much for having a jury of your peers.”

Corrections

88.2% of respondents think the Framework's recommendations will help reduce the overrepresentation of Black people in correctional institutions and anti-Black racism in correctional settings.

Reintegration and re-entry

88.2% of respondents agreed that the Framework’s recommendations would help Black inmates successfully reintegrate into society.

Victims and survivors of crime

During the engagement sessions, we were told that when Black individuals report being a victim of crimes, they were less likely to be believed when reporting the incident to the police. Others told us that despite increased police presence in their neighbourhoods, they still felt unsafe.

Immigration consequences for non-citizens convicted of a crime (deportation)

Canada’s Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, SC 2001, c 27 renders foreign nationals and permanent residents inadmissible and subject to a removal order under certain criminal convictions. Anti- Black racism within the criminal justice system has led to the overrepresentation of Black individuals in the criminal justice system. As a result, the removal of racialized foreign nations and permanent residents is often higher amongst Black individuals compared to other racialized individuals.

During the engagements with community members, we were told:

Data collection

Participants supported expanding data collection on the experiences of Black individuals with the justice system. 79.4% of survey respondents expressed concerns about the potential misuse of data due to historical over-surveillance of Black communities. This concern is justified, given the persistent issue of overrepresentation of Black people as victims and accused individuals with no substantial action to address its root causes. Participants also emphasized the need for performance audits and evaluations of legal service providers to measure efforts in reducing anti-Black racism and assess the effectiveness of actions post-CBJS release.

It is worth noting that the funding and timelines provided for conducting the community engagement sessions to inform the CBJS were woefully inadequate, which hindered the comprehensive execution of these data collection efforts. Jaku Konbit, and others, raised our concerns and expressed frustrations with having less than 70 days to undertake this important work. Moreover, the low level of funding provided to do the work meant that the research and engagement teams were significantly constrained, and the extent of community outreach limited. Put simply, it served as a reminder of how little respect and attention is given to Black issues.

As a community, we are all too familiar with being an afterthought and being underfunded compared to other groups racialized and non-racialized even when we experience similar issues. This is another example of anti-Black racism and the way it permeates organizational culture and structures resulting in well-intentioned individuals, including Black individuals in positions of influence, being hindered from doing what is right. Looking towards the future, it is imperative that the CBJS invest significant funding and dedicate appropriate resources and time for the recommendations to be successfully and efficiently implemented. If not, we fear that a strategy aimed at dismantling anti-Black racism may actually perpetuate it.