Victim Impact Statements at Sentencing: Judicial Experiences and Perceptions A Survey of Three Jurisdictions
References
- Bateman, A. (2002) Use of Victim Impact Statements:AlbertaLawyers’ Perspectives. B.A. Thesis, Department of Psychology, University of Calgary.
- Cole, M. (2003) Losing one’s Voice: The Victim Impact Statement at Sentencing. M.A. Thesis. Ottawa: Department of Criminology, University of Ottawa.
- D’Avignon, J. (2001) Victim Impact Statements: A Judicial Perspective. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba.
- Erez, E., and Laster, K. (1999) Neutralizing Victim Reform: Legal Professionals’ Perspectives on Victims and Impact Statements. Crime & Delinquency, 45: 530-53.
- Erez, E., Roeger, L., & Morgan, F. (1994) Victim Impact Statements inSouth Australia: An Evaluation. Adelaide: South Australian Attorney-General’s Department.
- Erez, E. and Rogers, L. (1999) Victim Impact Statements and Sentencing Outcomes and Processes. British Journal of Criminology, 39: 216-239.
- Giliberti, C. (1990) Victim Impact Statements inCanada. Volume 7. A Summary of the Findings. Ottawa: Department of Justice Canada.
- Henley, M., Davis, R. and Smith, B. (1994) The Reactions of Prosecutors and Judges to Victim Impact Statements. International Review of Victimology, 3: 83-93.
- Meredith, C. and Paquette, C. (2001) Summary Report on Victim Impact Statement Focus Groups. Ottawa: Policy Centre for Victim Issues, Department of Justice Canada.
- Policy Centre for Victim Issues (2002) Victim Impact Statements Case Law Review. Ottawa: Department of Justice Canada.
- Prairie Research Associates, Inc. (2005)Multi-Site Survey of Victims of Crime and
- Criminal Justice Professionals acrossCanada: Summary of Judiciary Respondents. Ottawa: Department of Justice Canada, Policy Centre for Victim issues.
- R.L. Sloan Associates (1990) Victim Impact Statements inCanada. Evaluation of theWinnipegProject. Working Document. Ottawa: Department of Justice Canada.
- Roberts, J.V. (2002) The Use of Victim Impact Statements in Sentencing: A Review of International Research Findings. Ottawa: Policy Centre for Victim Issues, Department of Justice Canada.
- Roberts, J.V. (2003) Victim Impact Statements and the Sentencing Process: Enhancing communication in the courtroom. Criminal Law Quarterly, 47(3): 365-396.
- Roberts, J.V., Doob, A.N., and Marinos, V. (2000) Judicial Attitudes Towards Conditional Sentences of Imprisonment: Results of a National Survey.Ottawa: Department of Justice Canada.
- Roberts, J.V. and Edgar, A. (2002) Victim Impact Statements at Sentencing: Perceptions of the Judiciary. Findings from a survey ofOntarioJudges.Ottawa: Policy Centre for Victim Issues, Department of Justice Canada.
- Roberts, J.V. and Erez, E. (2004) Communication in Sentencing: Exploring the Expressive and the Impact Model of Victim Impact Statements. International Review of Victimology, 10: 223-244.
- Rogers, L. and Erez, E. (1999) The Contextuality of Objectivity in Sentencing Among Legal Professionals in South Australia. International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 27: 267-286.
- Young, A. (2001) The Role of the Victim in the Criminal Process: A Literature Review – 1989 to 1999.Ottawa: Policy Centre for Victim Issues, Department of Justice Canada.
- Young, A. and Roberts, J.V. (2001) Research on the role of the victim in the criminal process inCanada. Ottawa: Policy Centre for Victim Issues, Department of Justice Canada.
- Date modified: