The Federal Victim Surcharge in Saskatchewan
Table of Contents
- Highlights
- Executive Summary
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Methodology
- 3. Findings
- 4. Key Learnings
- 4.1 Increase awareness, for all players in the criminal justice system-especially judiciary, defence and probation officers, of the importance of FVS in terms of funding specific programs
- 4.2 Increase involvement of criminal justice professionals at imposition and at enforcement
- 4.3 Examine enforcement of monetary penalties in general – same approach to FVS as to restitution and fines
- 4.4 Improve data tracking mechanism
- 4.5 Appeal appropriate cases
- 4.6 Examine effectiveness of CRA program
- 4.7 In Conclusion
- References
- Appendix A
- Appendix B
List of Tables
- Table 1: Responses by stakeholder group as to whether the FVS is waived more often than it should be
- Table 2: Federal Victim Surcharge waiver rates by disposition, 2002/03-2006/07
- Table 3: Federal Victim Surcharge waiver rates by most serious offence, 2002/03-2006/07
- Table 4: Federal Victim Surcharge waiver rates by specific offence, 2002/03-2006/07
- Table 5: Federal Victim Surcharge waiver rates by gender and type of accused, 2002/03-2006/07
- Table 6: Federal Victim Surcharge waiver rates by summary and indictable offence, 2002/03-2006/07
- Table 7: Logistic Regression for factors influencing FVS waiver in Saskatchewan Provincial Courts, 2002/03-2006/07
- Table 8: Collection data by fiscal year, 2002/03-2006/07
- Table 9: Provincial and Federal Surcharges owing over 6+ years
- Date modified: