Departmental Performance Report 2012-13
Section I: Organizational Overview
Raison d’être
The Department of Justice has the mandate to support the dual roles of the Minister of Justice and the Attorney General of Canada.
Under Canada's federal system, the administration of justice is an area of shared jurisdiction between the federal government and the provinces and territories. The Department supports the Minister of Justice in his responsibilities for 49 statutes and areas of federal law by ensuring a bilingual and bijural national legal framework, principally within the following domains: criminal justice (including youth criminal justice), family justice, access to justice, Aboriginal justice, public law and private international law.
The Department also supports the Attorney General as the chief law officer of the Crown, both in terms of the ongoing operations of government and of the development of new policies, programs and services for Canadians. The Department provides legal advice to the Government and federal government departments and agencies, represents the Crown in civil litigation and before administrative tribunals, drafts legislation and responds to the legal needs of federal departments and agencies.
Responsibilities
The Department of Justice was officially established in 1868, when the Department of Justice Act was passed in Parliament. The Act establishes the roles and responsibilities of the Department as well as those of the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada.
The Department of Justice fulfills three distinctive roles within the Government of Canada. It acts as:
- a policy department with broad responsibilities for overseeing all matters relating to the administration of justice that fall within the federal domain – in this capacity, it strives to ensure a fair, relevant and accessible justice system for all Canadians;
- a provider of a range of legal advisory, litigation and legislative services to government departments and agencies; and
- a central agency responsible for supporting the Minister in advising Cabinet on all legal matters.
The Department of Justice has approximately 4,800 dedicated, full-time equivalent employees. Nearly 60 percent of Justice employees are located in the National Capital Region. The other 40 percent provide a strong national presence through a network of regional offices and sub-offices positioned across the country.
Just over one half of departmental staff are lawyers. The remaining balance is represented by a broad range of professionals, including paralegals, social scientists, program managers, communications specialists, administrative services personnel, computer service professionals and financial officers.
Strategic Outcomes and Program Alignment Architecture
The Department of Justice aims to achieve two strategic outcomes that reflect the dual role of the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada.
- Strategic Outcome A: A fair, relevant and accessible Canadian justice system
- supports the Minister of Justice in his role as steward of the Canadian justice system by addressing policy questions through two programs: the Stewardship of the Canadian Legal Framework and the Office of the Federal Ombudsman for Victims of Crime.
- Strategic Outcome B: A federal government that is supported by high-quality legal services
- supports the Attorney General's role as the chief law officer of the Crown. The Legal Services to Government Program helps to fulfil this responsibility.
In addition, the Internal Services groups related administrative activities and resources that support the efficient and effective delivery of departmental programs and other corporate obligations.
Department of Justice Canada Program Alignment Architecture

Text version: Program Activity Architecture Diagram
This diagram presents the Department of Justice Canada's Program Alignment Architecture (PAA). It consists of five levels assembled in a hierarchy. The Programs, in order from top to bottom, are: Government of Canada Outcome Areas, Strategic Outcomes, Programs, Sub Programs and Sub-Sub Programs.
Government of Canada Outcome Areas
Social affairs
A safe and secure Canada
Government affairs
Well-managed and efficient government operations
Strategic Outcomes
- Strategic Outcome A - A fair, relevant and accessible Canadian justice system supports SOCIAL AFFAIRS, A safe and secure Canada.
- Strategic Outcome B - A federal government that is supported by high-quality legal services supports GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, well-managed and efficient government operations.
Programs
- Program A1 - Stewardship of the Canadian Legal Framework supports Strategic Outcome A: A fair, relevant and accessible Canadian justice system.
- Program A2 - Office of the Federal Ombudsman for Victims of Crime supports Strategic Outcome A: A fair, relevant and accessible Canadian justice system.
- Program B1 - Legal Services to Government Program supports Strategic Outcome B: A federal government that is supported by high-quality legal services.
- Program C1 - Internal Services supports both strategic outcomes.
Sub-Programs
- Four sub-programs support Program A1 – Stewardship of the Canadian legal framework:
- Sub-program A1.1 Criminal Justice;
- Sub-program A1.2 Family Justice;
- Sub-program A1.3 Access to Justice; and,
- Sub-program A1.4 Aboriginal Justice.
- Program A2 – Office of the Federal Ombudsman for Victims of Crime has no supporting sub-programs.
- Program B – Legal Services to Government Program has no supporting sub-programs.
- Program C – Internal Services is supported by three sub-programs:
- Sub-program C1.1 Governance and Management Support;
- Sub-program C1.2 Resource Management Services;
- Sub-program C1.3 Asset Management Services.
Sub-Sub-Programs
- Four sub-sub-programs support Sub-program A1.1 Criminal Justice framework:
- Sub-sub-program A1.1.1 Youth Justice;
- Sub-sub-program A1.1.2 Illicit Drugs;
- Sub-sub-program A1.1.3 Victims of Crime;
- Sub-sub-program A1.1.4 Integrated Market Enforcement Teams Program.
- Seven sub-sub-programs support Sub-program A1.3 Access to Justice:
- Sub-sub-program A1.3.1 Legal Aid;
- Sub-sub-program A1.3.2 Special Advocates Program;
- Sub-sub-program A1.3.3 Court-Ordered Counsel in Federal Prosecutions;
- Sub-sub-program A1.3.4 Justice Partnership and Innovation Program;
- Sub-sub-program A1.3.5 Official Languages;
- Sub-sub-program A1.3.6 Contraventions;
- Sub-sub-program A1.3.7 Access to Justice in the Territories.
- Two sub-sub-programs support Sub-program A1.4 Aboriginal Justice:
- Sub-sub-program A1.4.1 Aboriginal Justice Strategy;
- Sub-sub-program A1.4.2 Aboriginal Courtwork Program.
- Three sub-sub-programs support Sub-program C1.1 Governance & Management Services:
- Sub-sub-program C1.1.1 Management and Oversight;
- Sub-sub-program C1.1.2 Communications;
- Sub-sub-program C1.1.3 Legal.
- Five sub-sub-programs support Sub-program C1.2 Resource Management Services:
- Sub-sub-program C1.2.1 Human Resources Management;
- Sub-sub-program C1.2.2 Financial;
- Sub-sub-program C1.2.3 Information Management;
- Sub-sub-program C1.2.4 Information Technology;
- Sub-sub-program C1.2.5 Travel and Others.
- Three sub-sub-programs support Sub-program C1.3 Asset Management Services:
- Sub-sub-program C1.3.1 Real Property;
- Sub-sub-program C1.3.2 Materiel;
- Sub-sub-program C1.3.3 Acquisition.
Organizational Priorities
The Department of Justice established four organizational priorities for 2012-13, which are set out in the Report on Plans and Priorities. The progress made toward achieving these priorities is outlined below.
| Priority | TypeFootnote 1 | Strategic Outcomes |
|---|---|---|
| To enhance the personal safety and security of citizens | Ongoing |
|
| Summary of Progress | ||
The Department of Justice has taken a comprehensive approach to ensuring that this priority was met in 2012-13. Performance results pertaining to the personal safety of Canadians is collected every five years through the General Social Survey. The most recent results indicate that in 2009, 92.7 percent of Canadians were satisfied with their personal safety; 47.6 percent of Canadians being very satisfied and 45.1 percent being somewhat satisfied. These results exceed the Department's target of 90 percent of Canadians reporting to be "somewhat satisfied" or "very satisfied" with their personal safety. The next survey results will be published in 2014, and the Department aims to meet or exceed its target again at that time. In 2012-13, it has worked with provinces, territories and non-governmental organizations to reform laws and to support programs and initiatives that enhance the justice system. Safe streets and communities remains a priority of the federal government, and safety and security is a fundamental objective of a fair, relevant and accessible Canadian justice system. In 2012-13, the Department developed and supported criminal law as well as other federal law reform proposals to enhance the personal safety and security of CanadiansFootnote 2. These relate to elder abuse, the victim surcharge, terrorism and public safety. The Department supported reforms to ensure faster removal of foreign offenders by removing certain recourses, as well as supported the implementation of Bill C-31, which sets out extensive reforms of the refugee determination system and new measures to combat human smuggling. Moreover, the Department participated in various international forums to advance and protect Canadian interests and values in the development of global anti-crime responses to crime and terrorism. In addition, the Department worked with its partners to assist them in delivering programs and services that support the Canadian justice system. It engaged provinces and territories in discussions to identify emerging socio-legal issues and determine the best approaches to address them. The Department also worked with provincial and territorial counterparts on the implementation of the amendments to the Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA) that were passed in the Safe Streets and Communities Act and provided funding for the updating of the YCJA Sentence Calculation Handbook and training materials on the YCJA. Over $2 million of departmental funding was allocated to 65 projects that address the involvement or vulnerability of youth to gun, gang and drug activities. The Youth Justice Fund supports projects that encourage a more effective youth justice system, respond to emerging youth justice issues and enable greater participation by citizens and communities in the youth justice system. The Department also led the National Anti-Drug Strategy to prevent illicit drug use, treat dependency and reduce the production and distribution of illicit drugs. As well, it supported projects that promote family justice services, Aboriginal justice, and access to justice in order to enhance the personal safety and security of Canadians. In order to improve the efficiency of the Department's international technical legal assistance, it conducted an organizational review that enabled the Department to better align international legal assistance work with core departmental priorities. |
||
| Priority | Type | Strategic Outcome and Program |
|---|---|---|
| To support victims of crime | Ongoing |
|
| Summary of Progress | ||
The Department continued to advance policy, programs and activities that not only support victims but also ensure they have a more effective voice in the criminal justice system. A strong role for victims of crime in the criminal justice system is a crucial component of a fair, relevant and accessible Canadian justice system. The Department exceeded all of its performance targets related to supporting victims of crime. While targets at the sub-sub-program level are not published in the DPR, it is worth noting that 94 percent of survey respondents indicated that the funding was useful and helpful in reducing financial hardship (exceeding target of 75 percent); 99 percent of applicants (registered victims) received funding to attend Parole Board of Canada hearings (exceeding target of 90 percent); and 92 percent of applicants received financial assistance as a result of being victimized abroad (exceeding target of 80 percent). The Department provided $10.8 million in grants and contributions to support the following:
In support of a fair, relevant and accessible Canadian justice system, the Department's Policy Centre for Victim Issues (PCVI) continued to co-ordinate and develop all federal legislative initiatives and policy relating to victim issues, including the Federal Victims Strategy. The PCVI acted as the central point of contact for provinces and territories and led national awareness initiatives, including the 7th annual National Victims of Crime Awareness Week, with 162 funded events to advance and raise awareness of emerging victim issues and victim services. |
||
| Priority | Type | Strategic Outcome and Program |
|---|---|---|
| To support a healthy Canadian economy through high-quality legal services | New |
|
| Summary of Progress | ||
The Department of Justice serves the Government of Canada by providing high-quality legal services to the federal government and client departments and agencies. In support of a healthy Canadian economy and the Government's return to a balanced budget, the Department provided integrated legal advisory, litigation, and legislative and regulatory drafting services to client organizations. These services support a broad range of policies, programs and initiatives aimed at stimulating the economy and improving government efficiency. This work contributed to the Department's ability to exceed two of its targets with regard to the percentage of litigation files that have a successful outcome (settled and adjudicated) and the total number of bills tabled in Parliament and regulations published in the Canada Gazette. The Department is working to improve adherence to its service standards in the delivery of all legal services, including those provided in support of a healthy Canadian economy. Among Government initiatives that support a healthy economy, the Department provided legal services in support of:
Among Government initiatives aimed at achieving efficiencies within government, the Department provided legal services in support of:
|
||
| Priority | Type | Strategic Outcomes |
|---|---|---|
| To manage organizational change in the context of expenditure restraint | New |
|
| Summary of Progress | ||
The Department developed a Modernization Strategy as a tool for renewal and transformation in the context of expenditure restraint. The Strategy incorporates two components: implementation of the Department's 2012 Economic Action Plan commitments and, more generally, change initiatives to ensure a Department of Justice that is an integrated, inclusive, connected organization and a leader in providing effective, efficient and excellent legal and policy services. Through the Modernization Strategy, the Department successfully met its financial commitments as set out in the 2012 Economic Action Plan, exceeding its target of $12.3 million in savings for 2012-13. It did so by reducing discretionary spending on travel, hospitality and conferences and by increasing its use of information technology. The Department also successfully met its commitment with respect to human resources, reducing the number of full-time employees by 112, slightly higher than the planned target of 95. Using performance measurement and benchmarking, the Department optimized the usage of legal resources. One notable pilot project limited the number of hours to be spent on non-complex and low-risk immigration files. This initiative generated savings of $700,000 in one year. The Department will look into expanding this practice, where applicable. Furthermore, the Department developed a list of best practices for managers, such as increasing the use of paralegal staff, encouraging knowledge transfer, and offering training on project management principles for legal professionals. The application of these best practices coupled with evidence-based decisions, risk management and reviews of business practices allowed the Department to implement law practice efficiencies aimed at lowering the costs of providing legal services. These initiatives did not hinder the Department's ability to provide high quality legal services. It exceeded its target of 70 percent of litigation files that have a successful outcome (settled and adjudicated) by attaining a 74 percent success rate, consistent with last year's results and surpassing the 2010-11 results of 70.4 percent. It also surpassed its target pertaining to the number of bills tabled in Parliament and regulations published in the Canada Gazette, with a total of 541 bills tabled in Parliament and regulations published in the Canada Gazette. The Department also made a concerted effort to work with clients to deliver legal services more efficiently. Enhanced screening of client service needs and prioritization of high-risk requests were implemented. Regular consultation and dialogue with clients during the legal process ensured that resources were aligned with areas of highest priority and risk to government. The Department also streamlined the delivery of legal services through the merging of several departmental legal services units that served one minister and provided services in complementary areas of the law. These mergers allowed a rationalization of the work, a reduction in management overhead and the achievement of a more efficient service delivery model. Other initiatives included streamlining and consolidating internal and business services, modernizing the approach to research, and moving towards a full cost-recovery model for international technical legal assistance work. |
||
Risk Analysis
| Risk | Risk Response Strategy | Link to Program Alignment Architecture | Link to Organizational Priorities |
|---|---|---|---|
| Responding to new and emerging policy priorities in a timely manner |
|
|
|
| Maintaining partnership necessary for policy/program development and delivery |
|
|
|
| Meeting evolving demands for legal services |
|
|
|
The Department of Justice regularly assesses potential risks and integrates risk management into its corporate planning and decision making. In 2012-13, the Department continued to take action to effectively manage the principal risks to its stewardship of the Canadian legal framework and to the delivery of high-quality legal services, as outlined in the table above and described in greater detail below.
The broad scope and complexity of the justice system pose ongoing challenges for timely policy and program development. Moreover, the multi-tiered nature of the Canadian justice system requires the involvement and collaboration of various partners and stakeholders, including the provinces and territories, to advance policy and program priorities. The Department's ability to maintain these essential relationships may be impacted by the economic context of its partners and the need to balance expectations and interests.
In response, the Department continued to monitor and analyse emerging trends to inform its forward planning and maintain its policy responsiveness. The Department also undertook succession planning and knowledge management activities to ensure its workforce continues to possess the proper knowledge, skills and expertise to navigate within this complex operating environment.
To maintain partner and stakeholder relations, the Department has worked with provincial and territorial governments, delivery partners, and other funding recipients through an ongoing dialogue based on mutual respect, common values and shared interests. The Department has developed service standards and a recipient engagement strategy for funding programs and continued to implement an action plan to simplify and reduce the administrative burden on funding recipients. The Department also continued to collaborate through a number of federal/provincial/territorial and stakeholder coordination forums with particular emphasis on identifying priorities for policy-related activities.
In its role as a service provider to federal departments and agencies, the Department must maintain appropriate delivery capacity to meet the legal needs of its clients. This capacity is largely contingent on the recovery of costs from clients. Risk may be created as clients adjust priorities, particularly if there are unanticipated changes in the volume or nature of their legal service requests. This could have financial implications for the Department since it carries the upfront salary and operating liability of maintaining delivery capacity.
As clients sought to implement cost containment strategies in 2012-13, the Department focused on client engagement, including sharing information on the effective management of legal risks, the triggers and costs of litigation, and the appropriate role of legal counsel. The Department also continued joint planning with clients to ensure that legal resources were properly aligned with government priorities. Improvements in the Department's forecasting process were also introduced.
The Department's ability to meet service demands may also be affected by changes in law practice management. Legal work is increasingly complex and cross-cutting. Additionally, the volume of electronically stored information crucial to legal files has grown rapidly. In response, the Department continued to actively support ongoing professional development for its legal staff to enhance knowledge and understanding of new developments in a variety of areas related to the practice of federal law. The Department also continued to develop and enhance its tools, systems and processes in areas such as legal risk management and litigation support.
Summary of Performance
| Total Budgetary Expenditures (Main Estimates) 2012–13 | Planned Spending 2012–13 | Total Authorities (available for use) 2012–13 | Actual Spending (authorities used) 2012–13 | Difference (Planned vs. Actual Spending) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 694.6 | 739.9 | 1,065.1 | 1,029.4 | (289.5) |
Note: Net Vote Authority (NVA) is an authority from Parliament that allows the Department to spend revenues collected from other government departments and agencies for the provision of legal services and for the provision of Internal Support Services. The Department received NVA of $296.2 million. Total Budgetary Expenditures and Planned Spending for 2012-13 exclude the NVA, while the Total Authorities includes $296.2 million of NVA. Actual Spending includes the spending of the actual revenues collected for services rendered of $295.5 million, which is the main reason for the large discrepancy between Planned and Actual Spending.
| Planned 2012-13 | Actual 2012-13 | Difference 2012-13 |
|---|---|---|
| 5,098 | 4,778 | 320 |
Performance Summary Table for Strategic Outcomes and Programs ($ millions)
| Program | Total Budgetary Expenditures (Main Estimates) 2012–13 | Planned Spending | Total Authorities (available for use) 2012–13 | Actual Spending (authorities used) | Alignment to Government of Canada Outcomes | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-13 | 2013-14 | 2014-15 | 2012-13Footnote 4 | 2011-12 | 2010-11 | ||||
| A1: Stewardship of the Canadian Legal Framework | 408.7 | 409.7 | 383.7 | 343.5 | 434.5 | 424.3 | 426.7 | 428.1 | A safe and secure Canada |
| A2: Office of the Federal Ombudsman for Victims of Crime | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.3 | A safe and secure Canada |
| Strategic Outcome A Sub-Total | 410.0 | 411.0 | 385.0 | 344.8 | 435.8 | 425.5 | 427.9 | 429.4 | |
| Program | Total Budgetary Expenditures (Main Estimates) 2012–13 | Planned Spending | Total Authorities (available for use) 2012–13 | Actual Spending (authorities used) | Alignment to Government of Canada Outcomes | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-13 | 2013-14 | 2014-15 | 2012-13Footnote 5 | 2011-12 | 2010-11 | ||||
| B1: Legal Services to Government Program | 192.9 | 199.9 | 204.0 | 186.2 | 453.8 | 442.5 | 441.6 | 455.5 | Well-managed and efficient government operations |
| Strategic Outcome B Sub-Total | 192.9 | 199.9 | 204.0 | 186.2 | 453.8 | 442.5 | 441.6 | 455.5 | |
Note: Net Vote Authority (NVA) is an authority from Parliament that allows the Department to spend revenues collected from other government departments and agencies for the provision of legal services and for the provision of internal support services. NVA associated with Program B1: Legal Services to Government Program totalled $250.5 million in 2012-13. Main Estimates and Planned Spending exclude NVA, while the Actual Spending includes the NVA. This is the main reason for the large discrepancy between Planned and Actual Spending.
Performance Summary Table for Internal Services ($ millions)
| Internal Services | Total Budgetary Expenditures (Main Estimates) 2012–13 | Planned Spending | Total Authorities (available for use) 2012–13 | Actual Spending (authorities used) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-13 | 2013-14 | 2014-15 | 2012-13 | 2011-12 | 2010-11 | |||
| C1: Internal Services | 91.6 | 129.0 | 159.1 | 95.7 | 175.5 | 161.5 | 184.7 | 164.7 |
| Sub-Total | 91.6 | 129.0 | 159.1 | 95.7 | 175.5 | 161.5 | 184.7 | 164.7 |
Note: Main Estimates and Planned Spending exclude Net Vote Authority (NVA), which allows the Department to spend revenues from the provision of legal services and from the provision of internal support services to other government departments and agencies, while Actual Spending includes the NVA. NVA associated with the Internal Services Program increased to $44.9 million in 2012-13 from $39.1 million in 2011-12.
| Strategic Outcomes and Internal Services | Total Budgetary Expenditures (Main Estimates) 2012–13 | Planned Spending | Total Authorities (available for use) 2012–13 | Actual Spending (authorities used) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-13 | 2013-14 | 2014-15 | 2012-13 | 2011-12 | 2010-11 | |||
| SO A: A fair, relevant and accessible Canadian justice system | 410.0 | 411.0 | 385.0 | 344.8 | 435.8 | 425.5 | 427.9 | 429.4 |
| SO B: A federal government that is supported by high-quality legal services | 192.9 | 199.9 | 204.0 | 186.2 | 453.8 | 442.5 | 441.6 | 455.5 |
| P C1: Internal Services | 91.6 | 129.0 | 159.1 | 95.7 | 175.5 | 161.5 | 184.7 | 164.7 |
| Total | 694.5 | 739.9 | 748.1 | 626.7 | 1,065.1 | 1,029.4 | 1,054.2 | 1,049.6 |
Differences in Planned Spending for Strategic Outcome A: A fair, relevant and accessible Canadian Justice System from 2012-13 to 2014-15 are primarily due to initiatives that sunsetted at the end of 2012-13 and were not taken into account in 2013-14 and 2014-15 and to reductions in line with Budget 2012 savings measures.
Main Estimates and Planned Spending exclude Net Vote Authority (NVA). NVA is an authority from Parliament that allows the Department to spend revenues collected from other government departments and agencies for the provision of legal services and for the provision of internal support services. Net Vote Authorities associated with the Legal Services to Government Program totalled $250.5 million in 2012-13. This represents a decrease of 7.2 percent from 2011-12, which amounted to $270 million. Differences in Planned Spending figures for Strategic Outcome B: A federal government that is supported by high-quality legal services are primarily explained by reductions related to the Budget 2012 savings measures, which were offset in 2012-13 by an increase in planned spending related to the Law Group (LA) Collective Agreement.
Net Vote Authorities associated with the Internal Services Program increased to $44.9 million in 2012-13 from $39.1 million in 2011-12. Over the past two years, the Department has paid one-time severance pay disbursements to various represented groups including members of the Public Service Alliance of Canada. It is anticipated that the LA group will receive a cash out of severance pay in 2013-14. These centrally managed costs account for the majority of variances in actual and planned spending. With respect to expenditures, the Department's Internal Services have also been reduced in line with the Budget 2012 savings measures.
More details on these variances are available in Section II.
Expenditure Profile
As shown in the table below, the Department's 2012-13 Main Estimates totalled $694.6 million and its Total Authorities amounted to $1,065.1 million. The Total Authorities include funding received through Supplementary Estimates processes and Treasury Board Secretariat Central Votes in the amount of $74.0 million. They also include actual NVA spending of $295.5 million, which allows the Department to spend revenues from the provision of legal services to other government departments and agencies.

Text version: Departmental Spending Trend Graph
While spending had increased from $1,049.6 million in 2010-11 to $1,054.2 million in 2011-12, spending decreased in 2012-13 to $1,029.4 million (2.3 percent from the previous year). This variance is due primarily to a decrease in costs and demand for the provision of legal services to other government departments and agencies and from the implementation of Budget 2012 savings measures. The decrease in planned spending is mostly attributable to sunsetting programs that account for $52.3 million in 2013-14, $62.8 million in 2014-15 and $66.7 million in 2015-16.
Furthermore, as the Department deals with fluctuating demand for legal services, the profile of its Total Authorities continues to change from year to year. As the graph below demonstrates, the A-base and NVA significantly changed from 2010-11 to 2012-13. The trend shows a decrease of 4 percent in A-base as a result of the implementation of Budget 2012 savings measures and an increase of 2.5 percent in NVA over the three-year period. However, the NVA recoveries decreased by 4.4 percent from 2011-12 to 2012-13. The 2012-13 Total Authorities of $1,065.1 million include $768.8 million of A-base and $296.2 million of NVA. For the first time since the adoption of the NVA in 2007-08, the Department's revenues have decreased. In 2012-13, $295.5 million of NVA was collected. These A-base and NVA decreases are primarily due to the implementation of savings measures from Budget 2012 and a general decrease in demand for the provision of legal services to other government departments and agencies.
A-Base and Net Voting Authority Trend

Text version: A-Base and Net Voting Authority Trend
The Department of Justice Base and Net Voting Authority Trend bar graph shows on the x-axis, from left to right, fiscal years 2010-11, 2011-2012, and 2012-13. The y-axis displays amounts in millions of dollars from 0 to 1000. The graph consists of a group of two vertical bars per fiscal year, which represent the Net Voting Authority and A-Base Voting Authority for that year in millions of dollars. The graph shows that there has been a slight in Net Voting Authority in 2012-13 compared to 2011-12, as well as a continued decrease in A-Base Authority, over the three years displayed.
The Net Voting Authorities range from 288.2.4 million dollars in 2010-11, to 309.1 million dollars in 2011-12, and to 295.5 million dollars in 2012-13.
The A-Base Authorities range from 800.4 million dollars in 2010-11, to 797.7 million in 2011-12, and to 768.8 million in 2012-13.
Estimates by Vote
For information on the Department of Justice's organizational votes and/or statutory expenditures, please see the Public Accounts of Canada 2013 (Volume II). An electronic version of the Public Accounts 2013 is available on the Public Works and Government Services Canada's website.
Contribution to the Federal Sustainable Development Strategy
The Federal Sustainable Development Strategy (FSDS) outlines the Government of Canada's commitment to improving the transparency of environmental decision-making by articulating its key strategic environmental goals and targets.
The Department of Justice ensures that these outcomes are considered as an integral part of its decision-making processes. The Department of Justice contributes to the following FSDS 2010-13 theme as denoted by the visual identifier and associated program below.
Theme IV
Shrinking the Environmental Footprint –
Beginning with Government
Program C1: Internal Services
During 2012-13, the Department of Justice considered the environmental effects of initiatives subject to the Cabinet Directive on the Environmental Assessment of Policy, Plan and Program Proposals. Through the Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) process, the environmental impacts of any new departmental policy, plan or program initiatives must be assessed. Information on the results of SEAs will be made publicly available on the departmental website when applicable.
For additional details on the Department of Justice's activities to support sustainable development and SEA, please see Section II of the DPR and the departmental website. For complete details on the FSDS, please visit the FSDS website.
- Date modified: