Business and Regulatory Law Portfolio Evaluation

• Previous page

Table of Contents

• Executive Summary
• 1. Introduction
  • 1.1. Context
  • 1.2. Purpose and Scope of the Evaluation
  • 1.3. Structure of the Report
• 2. Profile of the Business and Regulatory Law Portfolio
  • 2.1 Structure
  • 2.2. Resources
• 3. Methodology
  • 3.1. Document and Data Review
  • 3.2. Key Informant Interviews
  • 3.3. Survey of Business and Regulatory Law Portfolio Counsel
  • 3.4. Case Studies
  • 3.5. Methodological Limitations and Mitigation Strategy
• 4. Key Findings
  • 4.1. Relevance
  • 4.2. Performance – Achievement of Expected Outcomes (Effectiveness)
  • 4.3. Performance – Demonstration of Efficiency and Economy
• 5. Conclusions, Recommendations and Management Response
  • 5.1. Relevance
  • 5.2. Performance
• Appendix A: Evaluation Matrix
• Appendix B: Logic Model
• Appendix C: Data Collection Tools

Acronyms

AAP

Aboriginal Affairs Portfolio

ADMO

Assistant Deputy Minister’s Office

BRLP

Business and Regulatory Law Portfolio

CLS

Commercial Law Section

DLSU

Departmental Legal Services Unit

DMO

Deputy Minister’s Office

FTE

Full-time Equivalent

IP

Intellectual Property

IT

Information Technology

LP

Law Practitioner

LPM

Law Practice Model

MO

Minister’s Office

MOU

Memorandum of Understanding

NCR

National Capital Region

PPSC

Public Prosecution Service of Canada

PSES

Public Service Employee Survey

RDG

Regional Director General