Evaluation of the International Legal Programs Section

• Previous page

Table of Contents

• Executive Summary
• 1. Introduction
  • 1.1. Purpose and Scope of the Evaluation
  • 1.2. Structure of the Evaluation
• 2. Profile of the International Legal Programs Section
  • 2.1. Background
  • 2.2. Structure
  • 2.3. Key Functions
  • 2.4. Resources
• 3. Methodology
  • 3.1. Document Review
  • 3.2. Administrative Data Review
  • 3.3. Key Informant Interviews
  • 3.4. Case Studies
  • 3.5. Methodological Limitations
  • 3.6. Mitigation Strategy
• 4. Key Findings
  • 4.1. Relevance
  • 4.2. Design of the Section
  • 4.3. Performance – Achievement of Expected Outcomes
  • 4.4. Performance – Demonstration of Efficiency and Economy
• 5. Conclusions, Recommendations and Management Response
  • 5.1. Relevance
  • 5.2. Design of the Section
  • 5.3. Performance
  • 5.4. Recommendations and Management Response
• Appendix A : Logic Model
• Appendix B : Evaluation Matrix
• Appendix C : Data Collection Instruments

Acronyms

ADM

Assistant Deputy Minister

CBA

Canadian Bar Association

DEPARTMENT/JUS

Department of Justice Canada

DG

Director General

DM

Deputy Minister

EAC

Evaluation Advisory Committee

FJA

Office of the Commissioner for Federal Judicial Affairs Canada

FTE

Full-Time Equivalent

GAC

Global Affairs Canada

IDG

International Development Group

IERD

Intergovernmental and External Relations Division

IRG

International Relations Group

ILPS

International Legal Programs Section

OAG/PP

Office of the Attorney General and Public Prosecution

NJI

National Judicial Institute

PPSC

Public Prosecutions Service of Canada

TCI

Turks and Caicos Islands

UK-CPS

United Kingdom’s Crown Prosecution Service (International Division)

UNOPS

United Nations Office for Project Service

US-OPDAT

United States Department of Justice’s Office of Overseas Prosecutorial Development Assistance and Training