Aboriginal Affairs Portfolio Evaluation
Appendix B: Evaluation Matrix
| Evaluation Issue | Evaluation Questions | Performance Indicator | Data Sources/Methods |
|---|---|---|---|
| Relevance | |||
1. Continued Need for the AAPFootnote 19 |
To what extent does the AAP address the needs of the Government of Canada and federal client departments and agencies? |
1. Extent, scope and nature of demand for AAP national strategic coordination, litigation, Aboriginal law practice management and legal advisory services |
AAP iCase reportsFootnote 20/analysis AAP administrative files/analysis AAP staff/interviews AAP clients/interviews |
2. Extent, scope and nature of past, current and projected legal risk related to Aboriginal issues of national/federal relevance |
AAP administrative files/analysis AAP iCase reports/analysis AAP staff/interviews AAP clients/interviews |
||
3. Extent, scope and nature of past, current and projected legal risks related to Northern development issues of national/federal relevance |
AAP files/analysis AAP iCase reports/analysis AAP staff/interviews AAP clients/interviews |
||
4. Monetary value of Aboriginal issues related to AAP work (e.g. monetary value of class actions, claims, settlements, government spending related to fiduciary responsibilities of Crown) |
Main estimates/analysis AAP administrative files/analysis |
||
5. Trends (past, current, forecasts) on the extent, scope and nature of Aboriginal legal, legal policy and Aboriginal justice policy issues of national/federal relevanceFootnote 21 that AAP are within the mandate and scope of AAPFootnote 22 |
Environmental scan and forecastsFootnote 23/analysi AAP staff/interviews AAP clients/interviews |
||
6. Extent to which AAP is perceived as relevant to the needs of the Government of Canada |
AAP staff/interviews AAP clients /interviews |
||
2. Alignment with Government Priorities |
To what extent are the activities of the AAP aligned with 1. Government of Canada priorities and 2. The strategic priorities of the Department of Justice? |
7. Extent to which the AAP activities are aligned with 1. Government of Canada priorities and 2. The strategic priorities of the Department of Justice |
Speech from the Throne, Federal Budget/analysis JUS strategic priorities/analysis AAP Business Plan/analysis |
3. Alignment with Federal Roles and Responsibilities |
To what extent do the activities of the AAP align with federal roles and responsibilities? |
8. Extent to which AAP activities are aligned with federal roles and responsibilities and legal obligations in relation to Aboriginal peoples |
Constitutional/Statutory Authorities/analysis PAA/analysis Analysis |
| Portfolio Design | |||
1. AAP Design |
Are the mandate and objectives of AAP clear? |
9. Evidence, scope and clarity of AAP mandate and objectives |
AAP administrative filesFootnote 24/analysis AAP staff/interviews AAP clientsFootnote 25/interviews AAP legal counsel survey |
Are governance structures, roles and responsibilities appropriate, clear, and being fulfilled as intended? |
10. Planned versus actual organizational structure and scope of implementation |
AAP governance structure/analysis AAP administrative files/analysis AAP staff/interviews |
|
11. Appropriateness and clarity of structures, roles and responsibilities within AAP |
AAP administrative files/analysis AAP staff/interviews AAP legal counsel survey |
||
Is the AAP structured in such a way that it is likely to achieve its objectives? |
12. Appropriateness of portfolio design to support the achievement of objectives 13. Factors contributing to/detracting from the achievement of AAP objectives |
AAP structure/analysis AAP administrative files/analysis AAP staff/interviews AAP legal counsel survey |
|
2. AAP Performance Monitoring and Evaluation Capacity |
Is there sufficient capacity within AAP to support ongoing quality improvement, performance measurement and evaluation? |
14. Sufficiency of capacity/resources/ 15. Methods/systems to support ongoing quality improvement, performance measurement & evaluation |
AAP administrative files/analysis AAP staff/interviews AAP legal counsel survey |
| Performance | |||
1. Achievement of Expected Outcomes |
|
|
|
| Direct Outcomes | |||
To what extent has the AAP produced high qualityFootnote 26 legal services related to Aboriginal law and northern development issues? |
16. Nature and scope of AAP legal activities/ servicesFootnote 27 undertaken in relation to Government of Canada needs/requirements |
AAP administrative files/analysis AAP legal files/analysis iCase reports/analysis Litigation inventory/analysis |
|
17. #/ files being litigated by AAP by scope of complexity and legal risk |
AAP administrative files/analysis AAP legal files/analysis iCase reports/analysis Litigation inventory/analysis |
||
18. Level of effort dedicated to the provision of AAP legal services (by file complexity and legal risk for files related to 1.Aboriginal law and 2. northern development issues) |
AAP administrative files/analysis AAP legal files/analysis iCase reports/analysis Litigation inventory/analysis |
||
19. Extent to which AAP clients are satisfied with the timeliness, responsiveness and overall quality of AAP legal services related to Aboriginal law and northern development issues |
AAP client surveyFootnote 27/analysis AAP clients/ interviews or focus groups |
||
20. Extent to which timeliness, responsiveness and level of quality of AAP legal services is demonstrated in selected case studies |
AAP legal files/analysis AAP case studiesFootnote 28/analysis |
||
|
To what extent is AAP contributing to enhanced capacity to deliver legal services related to Aboriginal law and northern development issues in an integrated/consistent and responsive manner? |
21. #/type/nature of quality improvement efforts planned/undertaken to 1. enhance Aboriginal law practice within the Government of Canada and 2. enhance AAP capacity to deliver legal services related to Aboriginal law and northern development issues in an integrated, consistent and responsive manner |
AAP staff /interviews AAP administrative files/analysis AAP legal counsel survey |
22. #/type/nature of internal structures, processes, tools and products developed/applied to enhance AAP capacity to strategically coordinate and deliver litigation and legal advisory services in an integrated, consistent and responsive manner (e.g. training, knowledge practice management tools & products) |
AAP administrative files/analysis AAP staff/interviews AAP legal counsel survey |
||
23. Nature and extent to which new technology has been planned/applied to enhance capacity (e.g. virtual teams)Footnote 29 |
AAP administrative files/analysis AAP staff/interviews AAP legal counsel survey |
||
24. #/type/nature of training sessions, presentations planned/delivered by AAP (within and outside the Portfolio) |
AAP administrative files/analysis |
||
|
|
25. Participant experience/satisfaction with AAP training and presentation events (within and outside the Portfolio) |
AAP training session feedback reportsFootnote 30/analysis |
26. Extent to which AAP capacity enhancements are demonstrated as effective in realizing integrated/consistent and responsive strategic coordination and services in selected case studies |
AAP legal files/analysis AAP case studies/analysis |
||
|
To what extent is the AAP contributing to enhanced awareness/ understanding within the federal government, of issues, options, approaches to Aboriginal legal, legal policy, and Aboriginal Justice policy and northern development legal issues? |
27. Evidence/effectiveness of AAP structures and processes that 1. Promote and 2. enhance awareness understanding internally within the Portfolio and horizontally across government e.g. AADM Joint Steering Committee, Client Claims Advisory Committee, Interdepartmental Working Groups |
AAP administrative files/analysis Committee and working group minutes/analysis AAP staff/interviews AAP clients/interviews AAP case studies/analysis AAP legal counsel survey |
28. Level/nature of awareness/understanding of AAP clients of issues, options, approaches to legal, legal policy and Aboriginal Justice policy issues |
AAP clients/interviews or focus groups AAP training session feedback reportsFootnote 31/analysis AAP legal files/analysis AAP case studies/analysis |
||
|
To what extent is AAP contributing to Aboriginal law and policy issues and claims being effectively addressed, litigated and resolved across government? |
29. Extent to which clients perceive that AAP is contributing to evolution of Aboriginal law, to Aboriginal legal policy issues and to claims being effectively addressed, litigated and resolved across Government of Canada |
AAP administrative files/analysis AAP client interviews /analysis AAP legal files/analysis AAP case studies/analysis Retrospective review of Aboriginal law and policy issues /analysis |
30. Extent to and nature in which AAP influence and expertise is demonstrated |
AAP legal files/analysis AAP case studies/analysis |
||
31. Extent to and nature in which AAP role in litigation and resolution is demonstrated |
AAP legal files/analysis AAP case studies/analysis |
||
|
To what extent is AAP contributing to the ability of government departments and agencies to manage their legal risks on Aboriginal issues? |
32. #/% of files where legal risk is reported as high, and nature of strategies AAP identifies/advises to manage/mitigate risk |
AAP litigation inventory/ analysis AAP client interviews/analysis AAP legal files/analysis AAP case studies/analysis |
33. Extent to which clients perceive AAP is contributing to the identification and assessment of legal risks related to Aboriginal issues |
AAP administrative files/analysis AAP legal files/analysis AAP case studies/analysis AAP clients/interviews or focus groups |
||
34. Perceptions of JUS officials of the AAP contribution to legal risk management of Aboriginal issues |
AAP Justice officials and other Justice officials outside the APP/interviews AAP legal counsel survey |
||
35. Extent to which AAP is perceived by Government decision makers as contributing to the decision-making process and to legal risk management of Aboriginal issues |
AAP clients/ interviews or focus groups AAP legal files/analysis AAP case studies/analysis |
||
| Ultimate Outcome | |||
|
To what extent is AAP contributing to a fair, relevant and accessible justice system that reflects Canadian values? |
36. Cumulative |
Cumulative/contribution analysis |
|
To what extent is AAP contributing to a federal government that is supported by high quality legal services? |
37. Cumulative |
Cumulative/contribution analysis |
2. Demonstration of Efficiency and Economy |
Has the AAP resourceFootnote 32 utilization been appropriate, in relation to the resources planned, and allocated, to activities and outputs produced and progress toward expected outcomes? |
38. Budget and work plan priorities and activities in relation to outputs delivered by AAP national strategic coordination and legal risk management, litigation services, Aboriginal law practice management and legal advisory services |
AAP administrative files/analysis AAP client agreements/analysis AAP staff/interviews AAP legal counsel survey |
39. Nature/extent of efforts to undertake AAP activities and deliver services cost-effectively (e.g. past, current and planned efforts) |
AAP administrative files/analysis Cost Structure Working Group reports/analysis |
||
40. AAP human resource plans/requirements versus actual HR profile |
AAP HR Needs Assessment/analysis HR plan/analysis |
||
41. AAP HR recruitment, deployment, engagement and retention trends |
AAP HR Plan/analysis AAP staff/interviews |
||
Is the AAP capacity to provide national strategic coordination and legal risk management, and to deliver litigation and legal advisory services appropriate/sufficient, given the current and future demand for strategic coordination, legal risk management and service delivery? |
42. Level, scope and nature of AAP activities in relation to demand for national strategic coordination, legal risk management and litigation/legal advisory services (past, current, projected) |
AAP administrative files/analysis AAP staff/interviews AAP legal counsel survey |
|
Are AAP activities sufficiently integrated/coordinated to support the achievement of intended results? |
43. Level, scope and nature of integration and coordination within AAP, JUS and with client departments |
AAP administrative files/analysis AAP staff/interviews JUS staff/interviews AAP client s/interviews or focus groups Case studies/analysis AAP legal counsel survey |
|
Are the funding models utilized by AAP appropriate and sufficient to meet current and future demand for services? |
44. Level of satisfaction that AAP and its clients have with the 1. AAP funding models generally and 2. the clients specific agreements |
AAP staff/interviews AAP clients/interviews or focus groups |
|
Are there alternative ways of delivering the same services? |
45. Trends in law practice/service delivery models (within JUS and within private sector as relevant) |
AAP Cost Structure Working Group Report/analysis AAP staff/interviews AAP legal counsel survey |
|
- Date modified: